RESULT FIGHTER EVENT METHOD/REFEREE R TIME LOSS Alberto Jarrin QFC 12 - Jarrin vs. Moya II - la Decision May / 21 / 2022 Decision (Unanimous) DRAW Alberto Jarrin QFC 8 - El Mas Arrecho Jul / 17 / 2020 Decision (Unanimous) LOSS Bruno Pereira da Silva ICC 7 - Cordoba vs. Andrade Dec / 14 / 2019 Submission (Anaconda choke) WIN Alex Yunga LFC 2 - Guerra de Titanes May / 05 / 2018 Submission (Guillotine Choke) WIN Diego Rumipamba QFC 5 - Quito Fight Club 5 Feb / 24 / 2018 TKO (Submission to Punches) LOSS Victor Fernandez Arias CRF 25 - Center Real Fights 25 Oct / 22 / 2017 Disqualification (Unsportsmanlike Conduct) LOSS Sergio Giglio 300 Sparta 19 - Giglio vs. Moya Jun / 02 / 2017 Decision (Unanimous) WIN Jefferson Angulo EMMA 10 - Extreme MMA 10 Apr / 08 / 2017 Decision (Split) LOSS Humberto Bandenay FFC 21 - Granados vs. Estela 2 Jul / 20 / 2016 TKO (Doctor Stoppage) WIN Cristian Lopez Desafio MMA 3 - WIN Francisco Ortiz Blood Line 1 - May / 09 / 2014 Decision (Unanimous) WIN Emiliano Cesar Colobon TFC 5 - Moya vs. Colobon Oct / 13 / 2013 Submission (Arm-Triangle Choke) WIN German Teran EMMA 5 - Bushido Mar / 03 / 2012 Submission (Triangle Choke) Jorge Masvidal, Kevin Holland Involved in Verbal Altercation Ahead of UFC 287 Julia Budd: PFL 2 Foe Larissa Pacheco More Than Just a Knockout Artist Diego Ferreira to Face Michael Johnson at UFC Event on May 20 With UFC 288 Looming, Charles Oliveira Coach Hopes to Earn Makhachev Rematch BKFC President David Feldman: Francis Ngannou ‘Asking for Unrealistic Money’
Feb 12, 1996 ... This circuit has held that aliens at the border are entitled to Miranda warnings before custodial interrogation. See United States v. Henry, 604 ... Checking if the site connection is secure casetext.com needs to review the security of your connection before proceeding. Performance & security by Cloudflare
---
---
This circuit has held that aliens at the border are entitled to Miranda warnings before custodial interrogation. See United States v. Henry, 604 F.2d 908, 914 ( ... United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Antonio MOYA, Defendant-Appellant. Before EDMONDSON and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and ENGEL *, Senior Circuit Judge. Bonnie Phillips-Williams, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Miami, FL, for appellant. Kendall Coffey, U.S. Attorney, Orlando A. Prescott, Linda Collins Hertz, Dawn Bowen, Yvonne Rodriguez-Schack, Asst. U.S. Attorneys, Miami, FL, for appellee. Defendant Francisco Moya asserts that statements he made to an Immigration and Naturalization Service inspector were obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment or Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). He thus urges reversal of his conviction (before a jury) for illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Moya arrived in Miami International Airport bearing a resident-alien card and a Dominican passport. When an INS inspector ran a computer check on Moya's resident-alien card, that check yielded a “TECS” match,1 and agents endeavored to determine whether Moya's arrival in the country was illegal. Moya was referred to the “secondary” area at Customs, where Inspector Juan Lopez, a U.S. Immigration Officer, led Moya to his office and identified himself. Lopez proceeded to administer an oath to Moya, to interview Moya, and to transcribe his comments. Moya's interview transcript was withdrawn as an exhibit pursuant to an agreement by the government not to use the transcript. The government did elicit some testimony about the interview, though, which reveals some of the interview's contents: Moya said he was entering the United States to see his family, denied having ever been deported, admitted he was no United States citizen, and said that he did not use aliases.